Posted on

One of my oldest friends (as in I have known her a really long time – she is not particularly old) recently sent me a link to a speech entitled “Solitude and Leadership” given by William Deresiewicz* in 2009 to the incoming class at West Point. The speech is long and intense. After I finished reading it, I thought about it for hours. The topics of the speech are, obviously, solitude and leadership, but what really compelled me was his analysis of popular culture and how our trend toward shallow, constant communication and information flow undermines our ability to generate original thought (which then undermines our leadership abilities). Please read the speech (if you are so inclined) as I couldn’t possibly do justice to a summary, but I would like to try (for myself) to pull out a few points that stuck with me:

  • True leadership involves introspection, an ability to “think for yourself and act on your convictions,” and a willingness to take risks, change how things are done and/or question why they are done.
  • Our education system (including our top universities) promotes the training of “world class hoop jumpers” rather than true leaders.
  • “Thinking means concentrating on one thing long enough to develop an idea about it”
  • Real thinking requires concentration and solitude — both of which are difficult to maintain when one is barraged by emails, texts, Facebook messages and tweets.
  • Although books can be a distraction from real thinking, reading books is better than reading tweets or wall post for two reasons: “First, because the person who wrote [the book] thought about it a lot more carefully. The book is the result of his solitude, his attempt to think for himself. Second, most books are old . . . They stand against the conventional wisdom of today simply because they’re not from today.”  And the “great” books don’t even reflect the conventional wisdom of their day.

I think a lot about this technological world our kids are inheriting. Information, as well as interpersonal communication, is increasingly delivered in superficial, bite-sized chunks. How will my kids learn to be alone with their own thoughts in a world with Iphone, Ichat, texting and tweeting?  At 7, 9 and 10, I can (and do!) set boundaries to limit their technology and, hopefully, to steer them toward creative and imaginative activities. But at some point in the not too distant future, they will have to set those boundaries for themselves (or not).  And even if my kids do learn to set those boundaries, how many of their peers will do the same?  Which brings me to one of Mr. Deresiewicz’s final observations: “The position of a leader is ultimately an intensely solitary, even intensely lonely one.”

I don’t have any answers about my kids’ future, but I think I owe it to them (and to myself) to pursue my own introspection, solitude, concentration and critical thinking.


*He is an essayist, literary critic and former Yale English professor.

2 responses »

  1. Not particularly, just old in the very general sense.

  2. I love how your synopsis looks forward! (I have to read it again through the mom lens.) My was more retrospective… The line that inspired me to share this with you was:

    …there’s one more thing I’m going to include as a form of solitude, and it will seem
    counterintuitive: friendship. Of course friendship is the opposite of solitude; it means being
    with other people. But I’m talking about one kind of friendship in particular, the deep
    friendship of intimate conversation. Long, uninterrupted talk with one other person.

    Naturally, it brought me back to those times, long after the parties were over and the cute boys had gone home (or to Melanie Hardiman’s), when we would lie around and deal with the quiet by synthesizing all kinds of understandings about life and human nature. Times like “those times” have been so central to my life, professionally and personally, and I find that they are always anchored by–or to not sure–a kindred spirit. I know I flatter myself in writing this, but I guess I felt vindicated by the idea that it might be OK to have a very limited ability to cultivate many relationships beyond those that manage not to interrupt the solitude.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: